Posts Tagged ‘not vintage’

It’s not vintage, it’s just not new

February 4, 2009

I’m starting to really dislike the word vintage. It just seems a tad overused – and I fully admit, I’m as much to blame as anyone else for this. There just doesn’t seem to be another good word for old, second-hand stuff that’s quite cool. But it’s starting to be devalued because it’s so bloody ubiquitous. A quick search on etsy with the keyword ‘vintage’ brings up 201,954 items! Over two hundred thousand vintage items? Really? Aren’t some of these just, well, old? Or not-new? Or new, but with 50s reproduction graphics? How do we sift through these gazillion vintage items?

A dictionary hunt brings up three definitions of vintage as an adjective; one, pertaining to wine, one “characterised by excellence, maturity, and enduring appeal; classic” and representing the high quality of a past time” and the third meaning old and out-dated. I’m just not sure vintage is the right word.

So I put my hands up here and admit that most of my Ladybird stuff is described as vintage. I’ve tried other wordings but nothing quite fits…old has negative connotations, second-hand is accurate but not necessarily appealing. I’m stumped. And still using the word vintage far more than is really, strictly necessary.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.